Vol. 7 No. 1 January 2003
The Coubrough Times
The Canadian Years
Jim and Annie 1851 Politics 1851 House and home Robert Coubrough & Margaret MacDonald
Barbara Another Barbara Malcolm Coubrough & Mary Cameron Robert Coubrough & Agnes Morton
Other branches Question corner Storyteller Subscriptions


Annie is still an alien

Happy New Year! Another whole year has flashed past, and we find ourselves once more at the start of a brand new adventure. Even though it's off to a rather slow start, we begin our seventh year of publication with an amazing discovery. Come on in, pour yourself a nice cup of tea, and pull up a chair to toast your toes on the oven door while I tell you a tale of mystery and romance.

There are old friends to catch up with and a few new ones to meet. Let's start by visiting a few folks we first met quite a while ago.

Jim and Annie

Everyone knows the story: Jim Coubrough married Annie MacDonald. They hung around on the East Coast a while, had a couple of kids, then headed off to farm the bush country on the far frontier of Canada West. Unfortunately, our story still has a few holes: Grampa Matt was born January 8, 1854, but was it in Halifax, Nova Scotia, or St. John, New Brunswick? When did his parents come to Canada? Were they married before they got to Nova Scotia, or after? And who were Annie's parents?

Some questions already have the best answers we're apt to get. We know from a copy of the certificate, that Grampa Matt was baptised in St. Andrew's Presbyterian Church, in St. John, New Brunswick. He was three months old at the time, and we will likely never know if he was born there, or if he went with his parents after having been born in Halifax. A tribal tales says that Grampa Matt's mother had barely made it ashore in time for his birth, leading us to believe his parents hadn't arrived in Canada before late December, 1853, at the very earliest. This search has been full of surprises, and the truth of this tale was another one.

I was recently at the National Archives looking for MacKays in Cape Breton. While checking an index of Vital Statistics from Nova Scotia Newspapers, the book fell open at the "C" page of the index. Near the bottom of the page, a familiar name caught my eye. I was so excited I could hardly turn to the page indicated. On Saturday, September 27, 1851, the Acadian Recorder had carried this tiny item, buried deep in the back pages:

Married

On the 23rd Sept., by the Rev. Alex Romans, A.M., Mr. James Couborough, to Miss Ann McDonald, both of this city.

There it was, in black and white. Two short lines of very small type held the answer to one of our great mysteries. Not only had Jim and Annie been married in Canada, they had both been here for at least two years longer than we had ever thought.

Every answer, though, brings more questions. Most likely, Jim came to Canada because the army sent him, but what about his wife? When did she land in Halifax? Why had she come? Did she come with her parents or was she an orphan looking for work? How did she meet Jim? Did they "run away" together, or did they meet in Halifax? What attracted them to each other? We may never know, but the 1851 wedding date does lay to rest a nasty rumour: Grampa Matt was born in 1854, so he could not possibly have been the reason for his parents' marriage. And if his mother really did rush ashore to give him birth, she was at the end of a shorter trip than the one across the Atlantic.

There are a few other interesting clues. Jim was not listed with his family in the June 1851 Scots census because he was already in Canada or else on his way here. The index where I found Annie's marriage had this item, dated June 10, 1851:

The 42nd Highland Regiment arrived on posting to Halifax from Bermuda, relieving the 88th Regiment (Connaught Rangers) which sailed from Halifax on 13 June aboard the transport Resistance.

Was Jim in Halifax in time for the 1851 census? If he belonged to the 42nd Highlanders, his and Annie's courtship was a short one--unless he knew her from somewhere else. Did he transfer to or from another unit so he could stay in Canada? Did she go to Halifax especially to join him? The newspaper announcement called him "Mr. Couborough," so he may have left the military before he married. On the other hand, Grampa Matt's March 1854 baptism certificate says his father was still in the Army, and it is unlikely that he had got out and got back in again. However they met, Jim was very young when he married Annie: he had been married a little over four months by the time he celebrated his 21st birthday on January 26, 1852, while she was at least 26. Over the last 10 years, we have identified at least 2 generations of Jim's ancestors and hundreds of his cousins. But after all that time, still all we know of Annie is her name.

1851

Politics

Halifax is an old, established city. It was founded in 1749 by Lord Cornwallis and 2500 British settlers, whose main purpose was to exploit the rich fishing grounds just off-shore. If they just happened to counter the unfortunately large French presence at Louisbourg, well, so much the better. Now [1851], it is a thriving, modern seaport that stretches along the harbour front for a couple of miles. Our city is bounded by the stately homes of our best citizens on the south, by the snug little houses of the Naval Dockyard's workers on the north, by the great Citadel to the west. Downtown, Province House and Government House are the finest public buildings in the land. We have the best educations, too. Our Dalhousie University is more than 30 years old and St. Mary's nearly 10. Our modern city is a fine place to do business. Mr. Enos Collins's Halifax Banking Company, and Mr. Samuel Cunard's Steamship Company are both thriving in the West Indian Trade. They will make their marks, those young men.

Our dear Halifax is such a delightful place, I can't imagine why anyone would want to live anywhere else. Even here, though, so many things change every day, it's a wonder we can keep up. The Connaught Rangers have left for home, and those wild, rough men of the 42nd Highlanders have taken their place. I daresay they will be no gentle replacements for our dear Rangers. Still, they do have such lively parties, and the officers are handsome. All the best people are seen there, so one can hardly stay away.

Our population is now more than 10,000 souls, and growing fast, but it is still comfortably British. All the best people are good, solid English families, some of whom came with Lord Cornwallis, and some who, always loyal to our monarch, came later--after their troubles with those pushy people further south. We also have lots of Irish and a few Scots. Not quite English, but at least they're British--not like those upstart Germans and Scandinavians that come here thinking they are as good as us. Our city leaders are staunchly British, as is only right. After all, we were here first. I have heard that there are actually a lot of Scots settlers in Nova Scotia, but most of them are on Cape Breton Island--Île Royale, as the Louisbourg folks call it. Only a sensible few have stayed in our dazzling city. Even mailing a letter will soon be different. The government has started printing small bits of paper that we will have to glue to our letters before they can go on their way. A "stamp" they call it, to prove we have paid for the privilege of letting the post office deliver it for us. And now I will have to pay instead of the person I send it to. Still, I suppose it is an improvement--it's only one cent to send a letter now, instead of 15 cents.

John Parr is our governor here in Nova Scotia, and Lord Elgin is the governor-general of the Canadas, though they doesn't have much to do with us. They have their own troubles, so they can't really be counted on to do us any favours. They are still going on about "rep by pop, (1)" whether public schools should be Catholic or Protestant and who should pay for them. Our system is much more civilised. All the official schools are protestant, but as long as the Catholic schools teach the approved curriculum, we give them public money too. The westerners do have a few good ideas, though. They want to build a railroad from Montreal and Toronto out here to our great port city. Think of the extra markets that will mean for us. It's a great project, but we will have to see what comes of it. They only have 55 miles of rail in their own provinces, so coming all the way out here would be an enormous project, and we aren't holding our breath.

House and home

Even with all our modern conveniences, a young woman about to begin keeping house for herself and her new husband has a lot of work to do. Unless they plan to live with their parents, her husband-to-be will select their new home, but there are still countless decisions to be made. If she was still in Scotland, the groom would choose and pay for her wedding outfit; here in Halifax, he still may, or she and her mother or her friends may choose it. Either way, there is much to do and she will have to start early.

Our glorious Queen Victoria was married in a white dress, so it is fashionable to be married in a white gown. For most women, the wedding gown will also be her "best dress" for several years to come, so it will be a sensible green, blue or brown, perhaps striped, but just as likely a plain, solid colour. If she is well enough off, the dress may be of cotton calico or chintz, but more probably of sturdy wool or linen. If, like our Annie, she is a weaver, she may weave the cloth herself, or she may buy it from the local draper. The next step is to cut out the new dress, using one she already has as a pattern. If she can afford it, she may hire a dressmaker, but most women sew their own (and their children's) clothes. The bride will probably sew the dress herself, perhaps with the help of her mother or her friends. Most clothes, including wedding dresses, consist of square pieces of cloth, with triangular gussets to make them fit a person's shape, and allow one to move. The pasterns are not complicated, but there is a lot of sewing and it will take several days of sewing and fitting to get it right. Annie's dress might look something like this:

If a girl is fortunate enough to be married in the same city she grew up in, she will have begun gathering her trousseau and other necessities long before she ever finds the man she will share them with. When she is ready to be married, she will already have all the sheets, towels and other linens she will need for her new home. If she has moved to a new city--or a new country--she will have plenty of work ahead of her to stitch up everything she couldn't bring with her. Even a modest home needs sheets and towels. If she has plenty of spare time, she might crochet doilies to cover the milk jug (and keep flies out of it), lace edging to decorate the kitchen shelves or the edges of the sheets, anti-macassars to keep gentlemen's hair oil off the backs of her chairs, or she might spend all her time just hemming enough sheets and towels to get started. If she has her own loom, she might weave her own sheets, and towels, or even blankets for her bed. If she is at home with her family, her mother might make her a present of one or two blankets, or her man might purchase them as part of the furnishings of his new home.

Even if a girl has family nearby to help out, setting up house-keeping can be an expensive business. Even small households need things that are difficult to make and expensive to buy, so she will have to make a trip to some of the local shops. For most people, a bed of some sort, a kitchen table, and a couple of chairs are basic requirements, but the new wife will need an assortment of wood, tin, iron and crockery items, too. In a pinch, the kitchen table can double as an ironing board, the kitchen chairs may be pressed into service to hold the washtub, and more than one new baby has slept in a clothes basket, but a kitchen can't do without a water bucket, a tin dipper, some wooden spoons, a flour sieve, flour barrel cover, a clothes stick (for stirring clothes in boiling water), and a mop or two.

She will need a large tin or copper kettle for boiling clothes on washday, a smaller kettle for boiling meat, and a dishpan. Other necessities from the tinsmith's shop are pans for baking bread, pies and cakes, measuring cups (in quart, pint, half-pint and gill sizes), scoops for sugar and flour, tea, coffee, cheese, and bread canisters, and a flour barrel. The iron monger has frying pans, soup kettles, cooking spoons, a tea kettle, toasting rack, griddle, and a flat iron for clothes. There are copper soup and tea kettles, but they are much more expensive than iron. Cooking pots, of course, are all well and good, but much more useful if you have a stove to put them on, or at least a fireplace, though of course only the poorest families still cook over open fires.

Earthenware crocks, mixing bowls, and baking dishes are also useful, though one could likely get by with a wooden bowl or two, and baking dishes could be dispensed with. She will have to have a china or porcelain service, and some nice silver ware. Her new husband would not thank her for making him eat his supper from the pot with the large iron cooking spoon! Tables must be scrubbed, floors have to be swept, boots need blacking, and so do stoves. A respectable housewife will find it difficult to do without a broom and at least a few brushes.

The amount of time a woman spends preparing her wedding feast will be determined by whether she is married in the morning, or in the evening, and by her own circumstances. If she is married in the morning, she is not obliged to give her guests more than a drink and a piece of cake, though she may prepare a larger breakfast, if she wishes. If she is married on a Saturday , or in the evening, after a day's work, her guests will expect a more substantial supper. Her means decide whether this is champagne, with several meats and fancy cakes, or ale and oat cakes. Either way, there must be plenty of it.

Lest we should think the bride will have things all her own way, I should mention that the groom will have his share of things to look after, too. After all, he will be the one who gets things started by asking the minister to call the banns. Announcing their intentions on three successive Sundays ensures everyone knows they plan to marry and gives everyone who knows them a chance to speak up if there is any reason why they shouldn't be married--like if one of them already has a spouse. Calling the banns is also free, unlike a licence, which may have a steep fee attached. Of course, men in a hurry, or with something to hide have been known to bend the rules by having the banns called three times in the same day!

With the help of his groomsman (often his brother or best friend), he will buy his bride's wedding ring, and pay the minister's fee. And he will choose--and pay for--the new home and any furniture it needs. Though he is not obliged to do so, a sensible man will allow his bride some choice in both--or he may live to regret it! The groom will look after getting his own wedding clothes. Like their womenfolk, the wedding suit will often be a man's "Sunday best" for years to come, so while he will want it to be of good cut, he will also want it of sturdy wool so it will last. If he is a weaver or tailor, he may have a hand in the construction of his wedding suit. If not, he may have one made for him or buy one ready-made, as his means dictate.

Mens's suits are of two main styles: The old-fashioned but still popular frock-coat has a narrow waist and knee-length skirt; and the new sack suit, which hangs straight from the shoulders and reaches only to the hip. A man's coat or shirt is constructed in in the same general manner as a lady's dress--square pieces with small gussets to make them fit a person's shape. 

Regardless of whether a woman is employed outside her parents' home before she marries, she will find her life quite different after she speaks her vows. So different, in fact, that one sometimes wonders why women do it. Most girls will have learned from their mothers how to keep house--how to cook and keep the house clean, how keep clothes clean, and how to look after children. Most mothers will have made sure that their daughters have plenty of practice, so this won't be a lot different, however.... Before she marries, a woman may do pretty much as she pleases; she may buy and sell her own property, or spend her money on fripperies. The minute she says "I do,", the only legal right she will have is to do what her husband tells her. Her new husband will now own not only any property she had before her marriage, but he will own her, and their children, as well. Her legal status is reduced to that of an idiot, a child, or a slave; that is, she has no legal right to anything, including her own body. If she should become a widow, she will have most of her rights back, but until that time, she will not even be entitled to a say in what happens to her children. In return, the law assumes men will feed and clothe their wives and children, but there are few means of forcing them to do so.

It is the nature of young people to believe that everything will be rosy after they marry, and for most couples it is. Most new husbands care deeply for their families. They take great care to see their wives and children well-fed and happy, so there is no point in dwelling on these negatives, but there is no denying that a young woman's life will be different: even her dress will change. No self-respecting adult female would go out of her own door without a hat on her head. Now that she is married, though, she will wear a white cap over her hair indoors as well. In some families, she may have already done so since she was 16. It will not do for a woman to show her hair in public; it might be more than a man could stand, and he would be tempted to evil. Today's fashionable caps are trimmed with lace and have lovely long lappets at the sides to trail down over one's shoulders. Even if she was the mistress of her own establishment, it will be different if she now has to cook for two people. Her new husband's tastes must now be taken into account, not only in food, but in friends, pastimes, and even the decor of their home.

Few men care to be seen as unable to support their wives and families, so if a woman worked outside the home before she married, her husband will expect her to give it up, unless they absolutely cannot get by without her wages. However, if she was employed at home, as a weaver, say, or a dressmaker, she will continue, but it will be only for their own use. Most women make their own clothes and those of their children, anyway. One can buy ready-made clothes, but they are mostly for men; they usually fit poorly and are often of poor quality. By the time they have children, though, many women are only too happy to give up any extra work.

Managing any household is plenty of work, though for a healthy young woman with only a husband to look after, keeping house is not necessarily a full-time job. This won't last long, though. Within a year or so of her marriage, a woman will often expect an addition to her family. Some of her spare time is now filled with extra sewing. Babies need lots of clothes, and the more she sews now, the easier things will be later. Besides hemming diapers and stitching nightshirts, perhaps she will knit some woolly sweaters, soft bonnets, and little boots to keep tiny feet warm. If they live near her own parents, or her husband's, the newborn may be christened in the same gown his mother or father wore. If not, maybe the new mother will sew a special long dress of fine fabric, then trim it with lace and fancy stitching for Baby's christening. For the safety of his soul, Baby must be taken into the Church as soon as possible; nothing says his family and friends may not enjoy the occasion. 

If the new parents are Scots, they won't have to worry about what to call the new child. For most Scots families, a child's name is a foregone conclusion, and his parents have little say in the matter. If the first child is a boy, he will have the name of his father's father; if the child is a girl, she will be christened with the name of her mother's mother. Thus, Jim and Annie know that their first child will be called either Flora or Mathew. The rest of the children will be named in order for the rest of their grandparents, then for their own parents. If the family is very large, some of the younger children may be named after their parents' brothers and sisters, or after friends of their parents. If a child dies, the next-born child of the same sex may be given the same name. If not enough sons are born to a family, girls may be stuck with a "feminine" version of a man's name, which is the reason for Robina (after Robert), Josephine, and Williamina (or Wilhelmina).

There are lots of things to do in Halifax, besides work. One can spend a musical evening at our concert hall or watch a play at anyone of several theatres. In summer, those who are brave enough can bathe in the ocean, while the rest of us settle for a picnic lunch on the shore. And there are always friends to visit, parties to go to, quiet evenings to spend at home with our families. (This last greatly appreciated by young parents.)

 

Robert Coubrough & Margaret MacDonald

1. You will no doubt recall that Margaret MacDonald's husband Robert was the son of John Coubrough & Catherine Andrew. When we began, Robert was something of a mystery man. We knew that he had married Mary Sandels. Their one son, David, had married Mary S. Mackay Smith, whose 10 kids were all born in Scotland, though the whole family moved to Montréal, Québec, in about 1912. Mary and David's grandchildren and great-grandchildren now live all over Canada and the US, and that seemed to be about all there was to know. But the more we looked, the more tantalizing little hints seemed to keep springing up and demanding attention.

It took a while, but we found the trail Robert left, and it just keeps getting better. Holding those little clues to their promise, we soon found that Mary Sandels was really Mary Sandilands, daughter of John Sandilands & Mary Cowan. Not only was she Robert's second wife, but she was a young widow with a small daughter of her own when she married him and went to look after his four children. Mary and Robert had not one, but three children together: Archibald, 1853, David, 1856, and Jeannie, January 1857. Poor Mary was widowed again when Jeannie was only a few months old. Little Jeannie herself died before her third birthday. We don't know exactly what happened to Archibald, but it seems probable that he didn't live long enough to grow up. David, of course, eventually grew up, married his darling Mary, and lived happily ever after. But that's not the end of the story.

In what we thought was a separate (though possibly related) family, we had some tempting clues to the identity of the Robert Coubrough who had married Margaret Clark MacDonald (1840, Eastwood parish). We knew the names of their four children, but not who Robert and Margaret's parents were, and they stayed on the alien list.

In what seemed to be a third separate family (again possibly related), the names of John MacDonald Coubrough's sister and brothers seemed to be nearly identical to the children of Robert and Margaret, but the names of John's parents seemed to be Thomas Coubrough and Margaret Douglas. There were enough similarities to think that, in spite of the parents' names, they might be the same family, but we could find no proof.

Robert Coubrough & Margaret MacDonald, Robert Coubrough & Mary Sandilands, and Thomas & his Margaret appeared to be three separate families. The clue here, though, was that they all lived in Thornliebank, and their children, all born there, seemed to have almost the exact same names. We didn't know what Thomas did for a living, but the husbands of Margaret MacD and Mary S were both cloth lappers, so it seemed that there must be a connection of some sort between these families. After much study of the available evidence, we began to think Thomas and Robert must be the same man, and that his name was Robert. Similarly, we also concluded that Margaret Douglas had to be Margaret MacDonald and that she was the one who had married Robert Coubrough in 1840. Further study led us to think that Margaret MacDonald must have died quite young and that her husband had remarried. It was then we realized that Mary Sandilands was probably the second wife, but we lacked hard proof--until the day we came across the 1861 census for Thornliebank. In that spring of 1861, Mary Coubrough, a 34-year-old widow, was head of a family of children whose names, ages, and birth order were identical to the families of both Margaret MacDonald and Mary Sandilands. The only plausible answer was that Margaret MacDonald's husband Robert and Mary Sandilands' husband Robert had to have been the same man.

Every answer usually brings more questions, but this time the answer brought more answers. If Robert was indeed the father of both families, the descendants of his sons John and David were also related. This answered another question: John's third daughter, Annie Culpin, was herself a young widow when she came to Canada with her two children, but no one now living knew for certain the reason she had chosen Canada. There was a vague memory that she had "come to stay with relatives," but no one knew who the relatives were. When we discovered that David Coubrough and Mary Mackay Smith, were Annie's uncle and aunt, the reason for Annie's choice of Montréal became rather obvious.

We had started off knowing little more than Robert's name. Now, more than 5 years later (2), we know he was at least the 2nd son of Catherine Andrew & John Coubrough, a power loom tenter. Robert had been a cloth finisher by trade, had been the father of at least seven children, by two different wives, and had died of bronchitis, at the age of 35, on a spring day in May, more than 140 years ago. We may not learn much more about Robert without going back to ask him, but the families of his children are another matter.

2. Late last fall, while searching for the name Coubrough on the Internet, I stumbled across a bulletin-board message posted months before by a Maureen Allen. She was looking for information on a Sarah Hewish who had married a James Coubrough. It happened that I had this couple in my records as the parents of a baby, one William James Coubrough, born 1877. I didn't know anything else about them, but I e-mailed her anyway. She had been searching for Sarah and James for years and my record of their son was the first clue she had got. And what a clue it was. Within six months, we had amassed enough evidence to conclude that Sarah's husband, a travelling draper, had been the youngest child of Robert Coubrough & Margaret Clark MacDonald.

James Coubrough, son of Robert Coubrough, cloth finisher, said he was a 25-year-old draper when he married 29-year-old Sarah Elizabeth Hewish, daughter of Richard Hewish, tailor, on March 2, 1877, at Chesterton, Cambridge, England. Their son William James was born March 8, 1877 Six other children followed: Margaret MacDonald, 1879; Richard David, 1880; John Robert, 1882; Harry Hewish, 1884; Bessie Emma, 1887; and Horace, 1888. Poor little Horace lived only one month, but all the others appear to have grown up.

James was only about 40 when he died of peritonitis from a perforating ulcer in June 1890, leaving Sarah with a large family of young children. We don't know how she managed to raise them all, but she doesn't seem to have married again. Sarah herself died of acute pneumonia, at the age of 62, in August 1908. We haven't yet tracked down any living descendants of this line, but I expect the only reason for not finding them eventually will be that there aren't any.

The 1881 census unlocked the secret of who Sarah Hewish's husband was, for it was there that we found Sarah and James had a daughter named Margaret MacDonald Coubrough. She was the key to the rest of our clues about James' parents. Later, the 1901 census that told us Miss Margaret had son named Stanley MacDonald Coubrough, born in 1896.

3. When Mary Sandilands appeared in the 1861 census, all of her children and step-children were still at home, with one exception. Margaret MacDonald's oldest son, Robert, who would have been about 19 or 20 in 1861, had left home, but we had no idea where he had gone. Was he one of the Robert Coubroughs in various other records? Was he even still living? Again, though, clues kept coming up.

During our search for James and Sarah's family, we came across a number of other Coubroughs, one of whom was a Robert in the 1901 English census. In keeping with our premise that everyone named Coubrough is connected somehow, we did some further digging and hit pay-dirt. Not only had this Robert been married twice, but he was a tailor and draper (cloth salesman) who had been born in Scotland, and he was exactly the same age as Margaret Clark MacDonald's son should have been. Moreover, he had called his oldest daughter, b 1869, Margaret MacDonald. It just had to be the right man.

It appears that Robert had gone to England early in his life, perhaps looking for work, and had stayed there. Possibly he was the reason both his younger brothers went there: John to become an insurance salesman and James to become a cloth salesman. Robert married his first wife, Mary Ann (we don't yet know her last name), about 1867, probably in England. Their first daughter, Margaret MacDonald, was born in 1869. She was followed by 6 more children, only one of whom, a boy named Arthur, lived past infancy. Poor Mary Ann died at the birth of her seventh child in six years. She was 29. Having two young children on his hands, 34-year-old Robert married again in 1876, to 24-year-old Catherine Amelia Channer. They had several more children, including a daughter named Jessie, born about April 1880, but we haven't tracked down any of the other names yet.

4. We have known for quite some time that after his first wife, Annie Inwood, died, John MacDonald Coubrough had married a woman named Louisa Amelia Adcock. What we didn't know was when. When the 1901 census turned up a John Coubrough, whose wife was named Louisa, we knew it had to be them, so it seemed obvious that they had been married sometime before the census in March of that year. We also knew that Annie had been alive for the 1891 census, so this greatly narrowed the number of records we had to search. Eventually, Maureen Allen, who lives in Cambridge, England, and who goes quite often to the record offices in London, turned up a death certificate for Annie, which said that she had died in December 1899. We still haven't found the exact date of John's remarriage, but the range of possibilities is a lot smaller.


Barbara

Now that we have found out so much about the grandchildren of John Coubrough and Catherine Andrew, let's talk a bit about John's sister, Barbara. As far as we have been able to learn, she was the only daughter in her family. And she was the original of the mysterious name Barbara. That was all we knew, and seemed to be all we were likely to know. Then, last year, the General Register Office of Scotland began making its vital statistics registrations available on-line. Anyone with a computer and a credit card can download copies of birth and death registrations for £1 ($2.50) each, so I ordered one for a Barbara Coubrough, age 67, who had lived in Eastwood parish. There weren't many women by that name, at that age, so I was pretty sure she would be Jean Muir's daughter--and so she was.

Barbara had been a power-loom weaver who had never married. Perhaps she had worked in the same family where her brother Mathew was a colour printer. Her residence at the time of her death from "old age and debility," on July 22, 1876, was 47 Heriot Street, Pollokshaws, which was just down the street from where Mathew had lived, at 22 Heriot Street. Barbara's death was reported to the registrar by her "nephew-in-law" James Campbell. James and his wife Jane lived at 44 Main Street, Pollokshaws. Jane, being the daughter of Barbara's brother Mathew, was of course, the younger sister of our very own Grampa Jim.

Another Barbara

Several years ago, I found an 1876 marriage for a Barbara Coubrough and an Alexander McHutcheson in an index. These entries don't give parents' names for either the bride or the groom, so Alex's wife remained on the alien list. Then, during the hunt for Jean Muir's daughter, I came across a death registration entry for another Barbara Coubrough, also in Eastwood. I wasn't sure who she was, but I figuring she had to be one of us, I ordered the certificate. She certainly was one of us: I was more than a little surprised to find that as well as being Alexander McHutcheson's widow, she was also a previously unknown daughter of Malcolm (3) Coubrough & Agnes McKinnon.

Agnes & Malcolm were married in 1807, in Eastwood parish. Their first son, James, was born in 1809, but Robert, the next known child, was not born until 1821! Judging by the large gap between these two sons, I felt there must be other children, but I could not find any record of them. Then came Barbara, who was born about 1829, and I began to think that Agnes and Malcolm must have just not got around to baptising their kids. My next find would lend weight to that theory.

Alexander McHutcheson had at least one son (Alex) from a previous marriage, but I found no records of any children for Barbara. This is probably not all that odd, however; Barbara was at least 45 when she married Alexander, and her death registration gave no evidence that she had ever been married to anyone else. Her husband may also have had other children, but Alexander McHutcheson, Step-son, was the one who reported Barbara's death to the registrar.

 

Malcolm Coubrough & Mary Cameron

Another discovery in the same family, which was to me even more surprising, was that of Malcolm Coubrough who had married Mary Cameron in 1856, at Rutherglen, Lanark shire. I had thought Mary Cameron's husband to be the son of Ann Boyd & Malcolm Coubrough, but I could find no proof--because there was none!

In December 2002, I received an e-mail with an index entry of the death of a Malcolm Coubrough, whose wife's name was Mary Cameron. I downloaded the certificate, and found Malcolm's parents were Malcolm Coubrough & Ann McKinnon. At the very least, this Malcolm had to be the brother of Barbara McHutcheson. I can find no other record of a Malcolm Coubrough married to Ann McKinnon. Either Ann and Agnes were same person, or else Agnes died and Malcolm married Ann, who may have been Agnes's cousin or even her sister. Malcolm and Agnes/Ann had at least four children. While still I think there must be others, I do believe that Mary Cameron's husband, who was born about 1830, was probably the youngest. If Agnes McKinnon was his mother, she was 40 - 50 years old by the time Malcolm was born.


Robert Coubrough & Agnes Morton

Once again, we ask blessings on the census takers and their pointy pencils. If not for them, we might never have known that four Coubroughs were living in Wales in 1901. Isabella, 41; Agnes, 37; Violet, 33; and John, 29, lived at Carnarvon, where John was apparently a calico printer. He was seems to have been the only one who was employed, with his sisters said to be "living on own means." The women being in their thirties and early forties, it seems unlikely that they married and had kids of their own after that. John may have married later, but I don't know where, when, or if.

I don't know when these folks went to Wales, but since they were at home with their parents in 1881, most likely it was sometime between then and when I found them at Carnarvon in 1901. Who were these people, you ask? "Cousins," is the answer. They were the offspring of Agnes Morton and Robert Coubrough. Robert, born 1832, was our own Grampa Jim's next younger brother, and so the uncle of our Grampa Matt.

Robert Coubrough and Agnes Morton had at least eight children. Their first son, Mathew, was 13 months old when he died of "hydroencephalus" on January 28, 1856. Agnes and Robert's first daughter, Isabella, was born a few months later, on May 9, 1856. She was followed by Jane, 28 Jan 1858; Agnes, 19 Jan 1860; Barbara, 12 Nov 1861; Violet, 4 Sept 1863; Robina, abt 1866; and John, abt 1871. The first six children were all born in Eastwood parish, where Robert himself had been born, and where Agnes and Robert had been married on January 3, 1854. They must have moved to England sometime between when Violet was born (1863) and about 1866-1867, when Robina was probably born, which might explain why they disappeared from the Scots records.

The census doesn't say why they moved, but like so many others, he may have gone looking for work. In the Scots census records for 1851 and 1861, Robert was a colour maker in a calico factory. In the 1881 English census, he was a "salesman to a calico printer." Perhaps the chemicals used to make the colours had caught up to him, or perhaps he just needed what ever job he could get. When people move to a new country, they often move to where they have friends or family. Perhaps Agnes and her Robert went to England because his "cousin Robert" (son of Margaret MacDonald) was already there. Cousin Robert was a draper (a person who sells cloth) who had already been several years in England and so was probably well-established there, and perhaps he had even given Agnes's Robert a job. At any rate, the 1901 census is the first indication we have of what had happened to any of the kids after they left home.

 

Other branches

1. Some time ago, one of my cousins began a hunt for two rather elusive men named Walter Coubrough. We had identified one of them as the son of Henry Coubrough and Marie Shellard, but the other was still "at large." In the hope of tracking down the remaining mystery man, John contacted a Katherine Coubrough who appeared to be from the same general area of the US as the mysterious Walter was believed to have lived. She told John that her husband, George Coubrough, had been lost at sea in 1964, but that he had been the son of another George Coubrough and a woman named Martin (first name unknown). She thought her father-in-law had been born in about 1904, probably in Scotland, and that he had been the son of still another George Coubrough, whose wife had been a Thompson. Ever optimistic, we continued the search.

There are several men named George in the Coubrough tree, and a few more named Walter. Neither is particularly common, however, so when, a year or so later, I was searching the Ellis Island immigration site and came across the name George Coubrough in the index, it caught my eye. I had to investigate, and was somewhat startled to find that not only was this man's name George, but his middle name was Thompson; moreover, he was accompanied by his older brother, Walter. George, age 20, was a railway worker, and Walter, 21, was an engineer. It was December 23, 1924, when they landed in New York, and they were on their way to Chicago, where they intended to stay with their sister, Mrs. Agnes Hodgkinson. I had to dig deeper.

Hoping Agnes had been married before she left Scotland, I searched the marriage record indexes, and sure enough there was an entry for an Agnes Coubrough who had married a Frederick D. Hodgkinson, in 1920. This was a bit of luck, as she would have been much harder to find if she had gone to the US before her marriage. The Scots marriage records were not yet available for download, and being a cheapskate, I was reluctant to fork over the £10 ($25) needed for a photocopy of the registration. While I debated whether solving this little mystery was worth the cash outlay, I had an offer I couldn't refuse from another generous researcher who offered to look up any records I might like on his next trip to the Register Office in Edinburgh.

Thanks to him, we have found that the elusive Walter and his brother George were indeed the sons of a Coubrough man and a woman named Thompson--just not the ones we had been told. Walter & George's parents were Walter McFarlan Coubrough and Agnes Thompson. The elder Walter was a son of William C. Coubrough & Margaret McKim, so of course he was also the brother of the Arthur Coubrough who had gone to Chicago in 1911 (Item 8, pg 11, July 2002), which means our Walter and George were Ellrigs. Walter McFarlan Coubrough died in 1923, so maybe that was why his sons went off to America in 1924. Both sons died in Los Angeles, California: George in 1956, and Walter in July 1973. I don't know if Walter was married or had any children.

2. Several of William Coubrough & Margaret McKim's 9 children ended up in the US at some point. A granddaughter of William and Margaret's son Daniel says her grandfather and his oldest brother, William (1868-1946), were the only ones who stayed in Scotland.

Robert, the second son, b 1870, married a woman named Maria Akhurst in 1898, in Sussex, England, and they had at least one son and one daughter, Marie, born 1899, in Brighton, England. They landed in New York in September 1923, on their way to his brother Arthur in Chicago. Robert and Maria gave their next of kin in England as "Son, Mr. R. M. Coubrough", of Brighton.

Walter McFarlan, the third son, born 1873, doesn't seem to have gone to the US himself, but as we have seen, his sons Walter and George did.

Thomas, b 1875, was Margaret McKim's fourth son. He died in 1876, before his first birthday.

Bethia, Margaret's fifth child and oldest daughter was, born about 1877. She married Joseph Foy in Glasgow in 1898, and they had at least 5 kids. Joseph, a plasterer by trade had gone to the US in 1909, possibly to work. There was an address listed for the person he was going to be staying with, but it had been crossed out and I couldn't read it. However, since he went to Chicago on his next trip, in February 1911, it seems probable that he had gone there on the first trip also. At any rate, Bethia and their five kids joined him in 1912, landing in New York on May 27, en route from Glasgow to Chicago. It was interesting to note that Bethia's youngest child, a boy named Arthur, was 5 months old when they left Glasgow on May 18th.

Malcolm, Bethia's next younger brother, was born about 1881, in Glasgow, but that's all I have been able to find out about him.

Arthur, born 1882, was child #7. We already know he married Ann Morrison and went to Chicago in 1911.

Daniel, born 1887, who was Ann Holding's grandfather, married Evelyn Cowie in about 1923 or 1924. They had 5 kids, but Daniel and Evelyn never left Scotland.

Ann, born about 1889, was the baby of the family. She may also have gone to the US, but I haven't found any record of her there.

3. In the last issue, I mentioned that I had thought William Crawford Coubrough, husband of Margaret McKim, had been an Ellrig, but I had not at that time been able to prove it. I have since found his death registration, and as it turns out, my hunch that they were Ellrigs was correct. The William who married Margaret McKim was the youngest of three sons of William Coubrough and Bethia Lancaster McMillan. Bethia's eldest son, Malcolm, b December 1841, was an unmarried apprentice blacksmith when he died of tuberculosis in November 1863. Her second son, Daniel, married Mary Wylie at Glasgow in 1887. They had 7 kids, two of whom died in infancy. And her baby, William, born about 1847, married Margaret McKim.

As for their being Ellrigs, I recently found the death registration for Bethia McM's husband William, who died November 1, 1877. It gave his parents as Malcolm Coubrough and ?Coubrough, MS McFarlane. Catherine McFarlane was the only woman of the right name at the right age at the right place at the right time who was married to a Malcolm Coubrough so she had to be William's mother. Malcolm, born 1789, was the 4th son of yet another William Coubrough, b 1755, and his wife, Margaret Gourley. William (1755) was the great-grandson of John Couburgh and Helen Stevenson, who are our "original Ellrigs."

4. We have also connected a couple of other living lines to their ancestors. In January 2001, I had a telephone call from a Jim Coubrough, of Glasgow, who told me that his father had been in Canada at some time in the 1920s, and that his (Jim's) mother had been born Elizabeth Badger. At that time, no on-line indexes had marriages later than 1901, so there didn't seem to be any hope of finding anything about them without visiting the Archives in Edinburgh.

In the summer of 2002, the General Register Office (Scotland) published their index of marriages up to 1926 on-line. One of the names I found was an Elizabeth Badger who had married a David Coubrough. Again being too cheap to fork out $25 for the certificate, I put them on the back burner. I did, however, write to Mr. Jim of Glasgow to ask if they were his. My letter was returned, saying the addressee had moved. I got an extract of the marriage record, where I found David Coubrough, born 1893, married to Elizabeth Young Badger in Alexandria, Dumbarton, on March 11, 1922. He was the third of six children of David Coubrough, born 1857, and Jane MacDougall, who had been married September 6, 1889, in Glasgow. David (1857) was the eighth of ten children of John Coubrough, b 1808, and Mary Ewing. John was the second son of John Coubrough and Euphemia Stewart Park, whose names you will recognize as the parents of Anthony Park Coubrough, who owned the Blanefield calico factory, and of James Hannah Park Coubrough, whose son James moved to Australia in 1883.

5. The online index had another Coubrough marriage in the same place only a few months later. John Coubrough and Margaret Ross, who were married on October 20, 1922. As one might expect, John, born about 1898, was David's younger brother, but I haven't yet found out anything else about them. Unfortunately, I still have not been able to track down the Jim Coubrough who was Elizabeth Badger's son to tell him all this.

6. Quite some time ago, I had an e-mail from a woman in Glasgow, asking if I had any information on her family. She could only go back as far as her grandmother's birth in 1914, though she did know that her grandmother's parents were James Coubrough and Agnes Docherty. Again, at the time she wrote, there were no marriages available on-line after 1901, so again, the inquiry went on the back burner. I did eventually find them in the on-line index last year, and when we looked them up, we found a James Coubrough, b 1874, married to Agnes Docherty on July 8, 1912, in Glasgow. James was the only child of John Coubrough and Marion Miller, who had been married in Glasgow in 1873. John, born 1851, seems to have died before James was 7 years old, and Marion eventually remarried twice, but I don't know if she had any more kids. In any case, John was the fourth of nine children of James Coubrough and Margaret Kennedy. James, b 1817, was the third of eight children of James Coubrough, b 1787, and Janet Adam. James (1787), was the next older brother of the Malcolm who married Catherine McFarlane, making James and Agnes Docherty's children Ellrigs, too. (Malcolm and Catherine McF were the parents of William who married Bethia L. MacMillan, at item 3, above.)

7. An interesting little tidbit I found on one of my Internet searches said a man named A.C. Coubrough was the 1922-23 Chairman of the "Institute of Engineers in India." He may have been Anthony Cathcart Coubrough, grandson of the calico factory owner, Anthony Parks Coubrough, but I have not yet established this.

8. While we are on the "calico family," I have found another little piece of the puzzle. I have long known that Isabella Veitch was the wife of John James Howard Coubrough, son of James Coubrough and Christina Colquhoun, and grandson of John Coubrough and Euphemia S. Park. I also knew that John and Isabella had three children. I later found the widowed Isabella and five children in the 1891 Scots census, so I assumed that John had died before that. According to that census, Isabella's two youngest children had been born in England, so they had obviously been there for some time before she and the children came home to Scotland. And there the matter rested.

Last fall, a fellow searcher began hunting through the English archives in hope of finding clues to the identity of James Coubrough who had married Sarah Hewish. One of the men she noticed in passing was a 35-year-old John Howard Coubrough, who had died at Barnet, Hertfordshire, in 1881. A couple of months later, I found John and Isabella's children in the 1881 English census. Isabella Veitch's mother was Jane Steele, so the Thomas Steele, whose home Isabella's children were visiting during the census, was probably one of Isabella's relatives.

Another surprise was that not only had John and Isabella's two youngest children, Stephen and Nellie, been born in London, England, but there was another baby between Stephen and his next older brother, James Park Coubrough. Poor little Agnes had also been born in London, in 1874, but she had died in 1876, aged 2 years, which was why I hadn't seen her in the 1881 census with the rest of the family. Agnes's birth in 1874 in London also meant that her parents must have gone there sometime before she was born, but after her brother James Park, who had been born in Glasgow, in January 1873.

John died in the first quarter of 1881, so at the census, the children had probably just lost their father. Their mother was not listed with them, so they may have been staying with other family while their mother looked for a place to take them home to. In March 1891, Isabella was back in New Milns, Loudoun, Ayrshire, Scotland, which was her home town. I don't know how well-fixed John had left her for money, but according to the 1891 census, all the kids, except James, were still at home and they were all working. Isabella was a dressmaker, working out of her home. Her daughters Jeanie and Nellie were lace curtain designers; the middle daughter, Christina, was a "lace curtain calenderer," whatever that was, and their brother Stephen was a lace curtain salesman. (One gets the idea that lace curtains were a popular item in 1891!) They must have been fairly well off compared to some of their neighbours. Isabella and her children had their whole house to themselves, while the house next door was home to three families.

Question corner

Here are some of the things I am working on. If you know the answer, please don't keep it a secret.

1. We have known for some time that James Cowbrough and Jean Muir had at least 8 kids, the sixth of whom (born 1805) was Mathew, father-in-law of Annie MacDonald, and grandfather of our very own Grampa Matt. We also know that there are large, unexplained gaps between some of these children, including the 10-year space between Mathew and his next-older brother, Robert, born 1795.

2. I also found some time ago that there was apparently a Robert Coubrough, in Eastwood parish, who seems to have been married to a Janet Muir. The International Genealogical Index lists a Thomas Coubrough, of Eastwood parish, as being married to a Janet Muir. Who were these people?

3. Years ago, I found baptism records for the children of a couple named William Coubrough and Elizabeth Dalgliesh. Just a couple of days ago, I discovered that William was a "sailor." For whom did he sail? I think this William was the son of William Coubrough and Janet Liddle (thus an Ellrig), but as far as I know, Janet Liddle's husband was a farmer. Did their son make his life at sea because as the youngest of 14 children, he had no hope at home? It will certainly bear further search.

4. We have know from the beginning that our Grampa Jim's mother was Jean Allan, but who was she? According to the census records, she was born in Thornliebank, in about 1810 or 1811, but that's all we know. She named her second son Robert, so that may have been her father's name, but did she call her first daughter Jean after her mother? Or after herself or her mother-in-law? It's a puzzle with few clues.

 

Storyteller

"My great-uncle Samuel Waterson (my Grandmother's brother) died in the 1st World War, and his name is one of those listed on the monument near my home. As a child, I was told the story and shown the name. Recently, as a matter of interest, I had a look at the other names on the monument. (It is a small monument, but well looked after--wreaths laid regularly by local Scout Troops, etc.) I discovered David Coubrough (4) was one of those on the same monument. He was considered a "son" of Thornliebank.

"Thornliebank is a strange place, despite the fact that it is now changed out of all recognition. The core of the people (descendants from the first "Thornliebankers") are still as proud of their "village" as their ancestors. In fact we still use the expression "going to the village" when we intend to visit the Main Street. As to the "core" of people, they are mainly descendants of the people who arrived in the district in the early 1800's to work in the newly built Printworks. Before then, Thornliebank consisted of only a few farms and less than a dozen families.

"The Coubroughs who worked in the Print Works were an exception, as I have always been told that they were in the district already. This would make sense as some of them were Farmers. Also I am sure (still to prove it though) that they had something to do with Alexander Crum building the Print Works and subsequent housing for the workers were he did in Thornliebank. One of the clues I have is most of my ancestors stayed in a small area (now gone) called Campsie Terrace. I have also been told that the naming of the tiny streets and terraced buildings were chosen to reflect their surroundings. Dairy Lane--previous site of a dairy farm. Hillside Terrace-- obvious one this--was built on a hill, and rebuilt as recently as 1977 on the same hill. The Land--this area is known as Alexander Crums land in the history of Thornliebank. I could go on, but back to Campsie Terrace. As we are nowhere near Stirling , I am assuming that the people who had something to do with the building of this particular housing area named it after their birthplace: maybe the Coubroughs?

"Another little snippet is that Campsie Terrace was built back to front. Back of the housing facing the Main Street of the Village, unlike the rest already built, which faced onto the street. The story is that Alexander Crum had a rather, shall we say, proud female in his family, who found it offensive to drive through the Main Street in her carriage to their estate (now a large, rambling, quite lovely public park) and have to look on the workers' wives and children sitting outside the entrances to the previously built terraces. The builders were then instructed to ensure that the entrances to any new housing were out of sight; hence the "back to front" homes."


Subscriptions

Paper copies are $5 a year (2 issues).

e-mail: myrna@coubrough.com

1. Representation by population. When Upper & Lower Canada were united, both had the same number of seats in the new National Assembly. By 1850's, Canada West had grown so much that they now demanded more seats.

2. For me. John Coubrough in Colorado, Mary and Robert's direct descendant, has been working on this puzzle for much longer.

3. Malcolm was born in 1787, 2nd son of James Coubrough & Jean Muir.

4. Son of David Coubrough & Mary Mackay Smith.